<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ByteSurgery &#8220;Plug Hole&#8221; - Analogy Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/02/28/bytesurgery-plug-hole-analogy-helps-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/02/28/bytesurgery-plug-hole-analogy-helps-innovation/</link>
	<description>Digital Media Engineering</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Corbett</title>
		<link>http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/02/28/bytesurgery-plug-hole-analogy-helps-innovation/#comment-10642</link>
		<dc:creator>James Corbett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/02/28/bytesurgery-plug-hole-analogy-helps-innovation/#comment-10642</guid>
		<description>Excellent thoughts Robin - you've grokked this better than I have myself! :)

"I also wonder - is a centralised pipe the â€˜way of the internetâ€™. Should we be looking for a â€˜distributed methodâ€™ where we cross reference our content in a feed, pointing at it in the different location rather than distributing it from a single source."

This is a question I struggled with for a while myself - I'm a strong believer in the 'small pieces, loosely joined' philosophy. But what I came to realize is that there is no contradiction here because the web is being effectively being turned inside out. The old model was of a distributed audience browsing to centralized portals/pages. So new model is of distributed apps browsing (centralized) people. This model recognizes the pre-eminence of the individual and the very nature of what makes social software work. 

The old web, the 'wide' web was a library, a static reference to 'dead' (archived) words. The new web, the 'live' web is a nervous system for the global mind. And human beings are the nodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent thoughts Robin - you&#8217;ve grokked this better than I have myself! :)</p>
<p>&#8220;I also wonder - is a centralised pipe the â€˜way of the internetâ€™. Should we be looking for a â€˜distributed methodâ€™ where we cross reference our content in a feed, pointing at it in the different location rather than distributing it from a single source.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a question I struggled with for a while myself - I&#8217;m a strong believer in the &#8217;small pieces, loosely joined&#8217; philosophy. But what I came to realize is that there is no contradiction here because the web is being effectively being turned inside out. The old model was of a distributed audience browsing to centralized portals/pages. So new model is of distributed apps browsing (centralized) people. This model recognizes the pre-eminence of the individual and the very nature of what makes social software work. </p>
<p>The old web, the &#8216;wide&#8217; web was a library, a static reference to &#8216;dead&#8217; (archived) words. The new web, the &#8216;live&#8217; web is a nervous system for the global mind. And human beings are the nodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
