<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let 100 Flowers Bloom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/</link>
	<description>Digital Media Engineering</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 01:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clunky Flow &#187; Heath Ledger dies. World economy stumbles. Auspices are good for TechLudd</title>
		<link>http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/#comment-20687</link>
		<dc:creator>Clunky Flow &#187; Heath Ledger dies. World economy stumbles. Auspices are good for TechLudd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/#comment-20687</guid>
		<description>[...] Others countered that the mark of a vibrant scene is to see lots of events launched and lots of events failing, and letting the market pick and choose. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Others countered that the mark of a vibrant scene is to see lots of events launched and lots of events failing, and letting the market pick and choose. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/#comment-20498</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/#comment-20498</guid>
		<description>Have to admit to finding this post refreshing after reading the quite depressing tone of the original comment thread, we're supposed allow for failures not kill them before they ever get going because they might not work out or someone else is already doing something similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to admit to finding this post refreshing after reading the quite depressing tone of the original comment thread, we&#8217;re supposed allow for failures not kill them before they ever get going because they might not work out or someone else is already doing something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eoghan McCabe</title>
		<link>http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/#comment-20412</link>
		<dc:creator>Eoghan McCabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bytesurgery.com/blog/2007/12/24/let-100-flowers-bloom/#comment-20412</guid>
		<description>Niall got it so right. You extended and explained it in a way I never could. People on both side of this debate need to understand this idea. Time to spread some links...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niall got it so right. You extended and explained it in a way I never could. People on both side of this debate need to understand this idea. Time to spread some links&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
